| August 27, 2008
Why the Drinking Age Should Not Be Lowered to 18
by Mike McManus
The presidents of 120+ universities, such as Duke, Tufts, Johns Hopkins,
Syracuse and Maryland - have signed on to an "Amethyst Initiative" in
which they say, "It is time to rethink the drinking age. In 1984
Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act which imposed a
penalty of 10% of a state's federal highway appropriation on any state
which set its drinking age lower than 21.
"Twenty-four years later, our experience as college and university
presidents convince us that `twenty-one is not working.' A culture of
dangerous, clandestine `binge drinking' - often conducted off campus -
has developed. Alcohol education that mandates abstinence as the only
legal option has not resulted in significant constructive behavioral
change among our students."
"Adults under 21 are deemed capable of voting, signing contracts,
serving on juries and enlisting in the military, but are told they are
not mature enough to have a beer. By choosing to use fake ID's, students
make ethical compromises that erode respect for the law."
Therefore, they called upon elected officials to "support an informed
and dispassionate public debate over the effects of the 21-year-old
drinking age, to consider whether the 10% highway fund `incentive'
encourages or inhibits that debate."
I am familiar with this kind of reasoning. I used to use it when I was
18, living in Connecticut, where the minimum age was 21. However, I
could drive to Port Chester, NY where I could buy drinks at age 18.
Fortunately, I made it back, but others did not.
The university presidents make a seemingly plausible case for lowering
the drinking age (though they say they are only asking for a public
debate). However, as university presidents, surely they know something
about research. Yet they present no data to back up their hunches.
Why? There is none, and they know it.
I checked with the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, and learned
that in 1982 there were 1,826 drivers aged 16-20 who died with a Blood
Alcohol Content of more than .08. That number dropped by 54% to 829 in
1992, saving 1,000 lives a year due to the higher drinking age. What's
more interesting is that number of those aged 21-30 dying due to drunk
driving also dropped from 3,948 in 1982 to 2,759, saving another 1,200
Saving 2,200 lives a year, plus countless injuries is a big victory.
The heroines in this battle were Mothers Against Drunk Driving, which
was organized by Candy Lightener, who lost her daughter to a drunk
driver. She and other MADD activists persuaded Congress in 1984 to cut
10 percent of transportation funding to any state which did not raise
its drinking age to 21. More than 30 states did so.
There is a real problem of "binge drinking" on college campuses where
more than half of students will drink five or more drinks in a sitting
(four among females). The question is, how will lowering the drinking
age do anything but encourage more binge drinking by younger kids?
No wonder Congress is unimpressed. "This small minority of college
administrators wants to undo years of success that defies common sense,"
said N.J. Sen. Frank Lautenberg. "We need to do all we can to protect
the national drinking age - a law that saves the lives of drivers,
passengers and pedestrians across the country each year."
What's needed is enforcement of existing laws - just what the college
presidents seem reluctant to do. Instead of doing their job, they want
to wash their hands of any responsibility.
What can be done? MADD pointed to the example of the University of
Rhode Island which was ranked the #1 Party School in America by the
Princeton Review for 1993 and 1994. Prof. Henry Weschler of Harvard
documented that 67 percent of URI students were binge drinkers.
URI President Robert Carothers decided crack down. First, he prohibited
all alcohol at any social functions on campus, a dramatic change. Drunk
students began to be fined $50 for a first infraction, $100 for a
second, and suspension after a 3rd offense. Nine fraternities were
closed from 1992-2001 for substantial abuse violations. Some have
reopened as alcohol free fraternities. The number of binge drinkers
dropped from 67 to 54 percent, the U.S. average.
Carothers acknowledges "We are an institution in recovery."
Students said the crackdown would result in fewer students applying to
URI. Actually, parents and students like the new rules. The number of
freshman entering this year will be the largest ever.
What can also make a difference is a crackdown by local police working
with a college. In Huntington, WV, police made frequent sobriety
checkpoints, and checks of bars near Marshall College for underage
drinkers. The odds of a 16-20 year old driver with a BAC level above .05
were reduced by a whopping 93 percent.
We do not weaker laws - only enforcement of existing ones.
30+ Years / 1700+ Columns
2017: Column 1860: Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part I
Texting While Driving - A Killer
Why Have "Religious Nones" Tripled?
Norma McCorvey Roe of Roe v. Wade
The Worst Valentine: Cohabitation
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard
Christianity Gives Women Equal Opportunity
Sextortion Kills Teens
Assisted Suicide Is Growing
same sex marriage,
abortion and infanticide,