November
26, 2008
Column #1,422
Death with Dignity - Or Coercion?
By Mike McManus
Ever since Oregon became the first state to legalize physician-assisted suicide
in 1997, "Death with Dignity" groups have been trying to peddle their macabre
plot to other states. In Michigan, voters quashed the notion by 71 to 29
percent in 1998. Maine voters rejected it in 2000 and 90 different attempts to
persuade State Legislatures to pass physician-assisted suicide failed.
Consequently, the Compassion in Dying Federation decided to rename their group a
more palatable Compassion & Choices, and repackaged their campaign. The word
"suicide" is no longer used. They called it "hastened death," or "aid-in-dying"
since polls show the public's more likely to accept the controversial practice
when the S-word is avoided.
Compassion & Choice then targeted neighboring Washington State because folks out
there are more likely to revere nature than God. Only 33% of Washingtonians are
members of a church, slightly above Oregon's 31 percent - half that of New York,
New Mexico or Arkansas.
Secondly, they raised a huge war-chest of $5.5 million. Perhaps the largest
contributor was former Washington Gov. Booth Gardner who poured in $470,000 of
his own fortune. "People have the right to have control over the final days of
life," he said to support Initiative 1000.
By contrast, the Coalition Against Assisted Suicide raised only $1.5 million,
despite generous giving particularly by Catholics. Its spokesman, Chris Carlson,
lamented, "Unfortunately, money can be a real difference in how broadly you can
spread the message."
He warned that the measure could be "a first step toward, not only
physician-assisted suicide" in which physicians prescribe deadly "medicine" that
patients self-administer, but also ultimately, lead to euthanasia in which
doctors murder patients directly.
That's exactly what happened in Belgium and the Netherlands, where
physician-assisted suicide soon morphed into direct patient killing, of not only
those requesting it, but those considered expendable -- babies with defects or
the elderly ill who are expensive to care for.
To counter the "expansion argument," I-1000 proponents focused upon the
statistical record from neighboring Oregon. Contrary to some predictions,
thousands of Oregonians did not seek a "humane and dignified death." In the 10
years since the law took effect, 515 people got a lethal prescription, and of
those, 341 ingested the killer pills.
Gardner argued that Oregon's experience "helps a lot." Opponents "say there
aren't safeguards and that's not the truth. The fact is (in a decade) "there
are no complaints. An issue this hot is going to have people watching it like a
hawk."
Not quite. Oregon's reporting system has an utter lack of transparency and
accountability. There are enough loopholes in the law "to drive a hearse
through," asserts Rita Marker, an attorney and executive director of the
International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. The crime of
assisted suicide was transformed into a medical treatment.
That's why it is opposed by the state's nurses, disability groups and 9,000
physicians.
One of the loopholes is that there are no penalties for physicians who do not
report prescribing fatal doses. Perhaps 5,150 did so, not the 515 officially
reported. Secondly, the reports doctors file are destroyed each year after they
are counted. So there is no way to independently investigate the program..
Rita Marker says "The only thing we really know about Oregon is that there have
been 341 REPORTED deaths and no REPORTED abuses. The International Task Force
has found abuse and been screaming about it every since the law took effect."
The law is supposed to apply only to residents who are 18 or older, mentally
competent and have a diagnosed life expectancy of less than six months.
Patients must request their prescription, fill out a form, wait 15 days and make
a second oral request.
However, consider the case of Barbara Wagner, a 64-year-old whose doctor told
her that her cancer, which had been in remission, had returned. He prescribed a
new drug to slow its growth and extend her life. Since the drug is expensive,
the Oregon Health Plan, the state's Medicaid program - told her via an unsigned
form letter that it would not cover the cost.
However, the letter said the plan would pay for "physician aid in dying."
"They would pay to kill me, but they will not give me the medication to slow the
growth of my cancer," she said tearfully in a video for the Coalition Against
Assisted Suicide.
That's coercion for financial reasons, not death with dignity.
With its 4-1 funding advantage, Washington voters were persuaded by a huge 58
to 42 percent margin to legalize physician-assisted suicide, the second state
with such a law.
Expect more coercion by the state and relatives in the will of the frail
elderly. |
| |
30+ Years / 1700+ Columns |
| |
LATEST ARTICLE |
| |
June 22,
2017: Column 1869: The Need For Stronger Gun Laws |
| |
Recent Columns |
| |
Trump Should Be Impeached |
| |
Can Euthanasia Be Justified? |
| |
Trump's Budget - A Disaster |
| |
Trump Eliminates U.S. Abortion Funding Abroad |
| |
Comey Fired for Wrong Reasons |
| |
Should FBI Director Comey Be Fired? |
| |
Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part II |
| |
Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part I |
| |
Texting While Driving - A Killer |
| |
Why Have "Religious Nones" Tripled? |
| |
Norma McCorvey Roe of Roe v. Wade |
| |
The Worst Valentine: Cohabitation |
| |
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard |
| |
Christianity Gives Women Equal Opportunity |
| |
Sextortion Kills Teens |
| |
Assisted Suicide Is Growing |
| |
Muslim Violence
Against Christians |
| |
Recent Searches |
| |
alcoholism,
prayer,
guns,
same sex marriage,
abortion,
depression,
islam,
divorce,
polygamy,
religious liberty,
health care,
pornography,
teen sex,
abortion and infanticide,
Roe+v+Wade,
supreme court,
marriage,
movies,
violence,
celibacy,
living+together,
cohabitation,
ethics+and+religion,
pornography,
adultery,
divorce,
saving+marriages |
|
