June 27, 2013
Supreme Court Did Not Endorse
By Mike McManus
Advocates of traditional marriage were hit with two Supreme
Court decisions this week that come close to endorsing the
legitimacy of same-sex marriage – but do not do so.
First, the Court ruled that the federal Defense of Marriage Act
(DOMA) which was passed in 1986 by overwhelming votes of 342-67
in the House and by 85-14 in the Senate – is unconstitutional.
At the time no state had legalized same-sex marriage (SSM). When
the Court heard arguments on DOMA, nine states had declared SSM
legal (and three more have done so).
Therefore, I predicted in March that the Court would “overturn
DOMA so that federal benefits will go to SSM couples in states
that legalized it.”
What’s important to note, however, is that the Supreme Court did
not also announce a “constitutional right to same-sex marriage.”
It could have done so, but exercised a restraint that the Court
lacked in its Roe v. Wade decision 40 years ago that legalized
abortion for all states, rather than in the one state at issue.
That’s a modest but significant victory.
Similarly, in a separate case, reviewing California’s
Proposition 8, in which 7 million voters added an amendment to
the state constitution limiting marriage only to unions “between
and a man and a woman”- the Court allowed a lower court
rejection of Prop 8 to stand.
“For most Americans the big picture is more of what the Court
did not do,” said Focus on the Family President Jim Daly. “It
did not create a federal constitutional right to same-sex
marriage – as it did for abortion in 1973. It also did not
declare same-sex marriage a civil right.”
The Court has allowed the national debate on marriage to
continue. “The Supreme Court’s decision doesn’t change the fact
that society needs children, and child still need a mother and
father,” said Nicole Theis, president of the Delaware Family
However, the Prop 8 decision is disheartening.
How could it so blithely dismiss the votes of 7 million
Americans? How could it uphold Prop 8’s rejection by one federal
judge who is an active homosexual living with another man? The
Court should have upheld the people’s voice over that of a judge
who should have recused himself from the case, due to his
conflict of interest.
This is a corrupt decision, which brings rare dishonor to the
The DOMA decision also was unnecessarily nasty. The majority
opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy (joined by four
liberal justices), contains these words:
“What has been exploited to this point should more than suffice
to establish that the principal purpose and the necessary effect
of this law are to demean those persons who are in a lawful
What rot. There were no such marriages in 1996. The overwhelming
vote of Congress and President Clinton signing it into law - was
not based on hatred of gays, but on the public’soverwhelming
support for traditional marriage.
In a stinging rebuke of the Kennedy argument, Justice Antonin
Scalia wrote, “In the majority’s telling, this story is
black-and-white: Hate your neighbor or come along with us.” In
so doing, “the court has cheated both sides, robbing the winners
of an honest victory, and the losers of the peace that comes
from a fair defeat.”
Brian Brown, President of the National Organization for
Marriage, declared “There is a stench to these decisions that
has stained the Supreme Court,”
Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York and president of the U.S.
Conference of Catholic Bishops and Archbishop Salvatore
Cordileone of San Francisco, who chairs the bishop’s marriage
committee, called the decisions a “tragic day for marriage and
“The Court got it wrong. The federal government ought to respect
the truth that marriage is the union of one man and one woman,
even where states fail to do so….Marriage is the only
institution that brings together a man and a woman for life,
providing any child who comes from their union with the secure
foundation of a mother and father.”
What can be done now?
Believers in traditional marriage must redouble their efforts to
make marriage a union for life. Marriage rates have plunged 57%
since 1970. The sad result is that the number of never-married
Americans has soared from 21 million in 1970 to 77 million last
More than a million couples divorce every year. This is a trend
which can be reversed. The clergy of 229 cities have created
Community Marriage Policies that have reduced divorce rates
enough to save 100,000 marriages.
There is hope.
30+ Years / 1700+ Columns
2017: Column 1861: Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part II
Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part I
Texting While Driving - A Killer
Why Have "Religious Nones" Tripled?
Norma McCorvey Roe of Roe v. Wade
The Worst Valentine: Cohabitation
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard
Christianity Gives Women Equal Opportunity
Sextortion Kills Teens
Assisted Suicide Is Growing
same sex marriage,
abortion and infanticide,