March 27, 2014
A Landmark Religious Liberty Case
By Mike McManus
In a landmark case this week the Supreme Court appeared
narrowly supportive of objections by two family-owned businesses on religious
grounds to being forced to give employees “morning after pills” that abort a
growing embryo. Of Obamacare’s mandate to offer 20 different forms of birth
control, the companies provide 16, opposing only Plan B-type drugs that cause
That mandate has sparked scores of federal suits by Catholic dioceses, Southern
Baptists, Catholic University, Wheaton College and for-profit companies.
The first to reach the Supreme Court were the cases of Hobby Lobby, a company
with 561 stores owned by a Catholic couple, David and Barbara Green, and
Conestoga Wood Specialties, a cabinet-making firm owned by a Mennonite family.
Hobby Lobby takes pride in honoring God by operating their company “in a manner
consistent with Biblical principles,” says David Green. For example, wages begin
at 90% above the minimum wage, and the stores are closed on Sunday – a big day
for retailers – so employees can worship and enjoy a day of rest.
However, their attorney, Paul Clement, was unable to complete his second
sentence before being sneeringly interrupted by Justice Sonia Sotomayor asking
if his case included blood transfusions, vaccines and products made of pork that
some object to on religious grounds.
Justice Elena Kagan chimed in asking about employers who object to funding
vaccinations for employees. None were named. This was pure harassment.
Clement noted that Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)
in 1993 (unanimously by the House, and nearly so in the Senate) that prohibits
the federal government from imposing a “substantial burden” on a person’s
exercise of religion unless there is a “compelling governmental interest.”
Kagan argued that RFRA could be used by employers who could claim religious
objections to minimum wage laws, family leave or child labor laws. Clement
easily dismissed her “parade of horribles.”
However, Sotomayor noted the companies could choose “not to give health
insurance and pay not that high a penalty.”
Clement replied Hobby could pay a penalty of $475 million or drop coverage and
pay $2,000 per employee or $26 million. However, Chief Justice John Roberts
stated that part of the owner’s commitment to employees was to provide health
Clement replied that if it dropped health coverage it would have to increase
wages plus pay the $26 million, and would be worse off.
Justice Anthony Kennedy expressed some sympathy for religiously devout business
owners that do have rights like that of an individual, but asked how that should
be balanced against the “rights of the employees?” The workers might not share
“religious beliefs of the employer ” He felt worker’s interests shouldn’t be
“just trumped” by the owners’ beliefs.
Clement agreed and added that women could get an abortion - with perhaps the
government paying for it.
U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued that to allow for profit
corporations to “make claims for religious exemptions” to general laws would be
a “vast expansion of what Congress” had in mind in passing RFRA.
Chief Justice Roberts doubted that large publicly traded corporations would make
such a claim, implying that he could accept such a claim by family-owned
In one of the liveliest exchanges, Kennedy charged that in Verrilli’s view,
corporations “could be forced in principle to pay for abortions.”
Verrilli responded, “The law is to the contrary.” Kennedy snapped, “But your
reasoning would permit that.”
The Chief Justice asked, “Isn’t that what we are talking about in terms of their
religious beliefs,” the drugs “they believe provide abortions?”
Verrilli replied that while he did not question the sincerity of the companies’
beliefs, but federal and state laws that preclude funding of abortions, do not
consider the drugs to cause abortions.
Hold on a minute. They are called “morning after pills” for a reason, that after
a couple has had sex, which might have caused a pregnancy, the woman’s taking of
the pills will kill that embryo.
Galen Carey, of the National Association of Evangelicals, is hopeful a majority
of the court “will recognize the religious freedom issue. The plaintiffs have a
strong case and do not want to live in a country where good people are made to
do things they believe are wrong.”
Mike Huckabee asserted “The First Amendment states that Congress shall pass no
law that prefers or prohibits freedom of expression. IF Obamacare forces Hobby
Lobby to provide abortion drugs even though the privately owned company opposes
it on moral grounds – that’s a fundamental loss of liberty.”
It is indeed.
30+ Years / 1700+ Columns
2017: Column 1861: Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part II
Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part I
Texting While Driving - A Killer
Why Have "Religious Nones" Tripled?
Norma McCorvey Roe of Roe v. Wade
The Worst Valentine: Cohabitation
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard
Christianity Gives Women Equal Opportunity
Sextortion Kills Teens
Assisted Suicide Is Growing
same sex marriage,
abortion and infanticide,