May 8, 2014
Column #1,706
Opening Prayers of Government
By Mike McManus “What the circumstances here demand is the recognition that we
are a pluralistic people too,” wrote Justice Elena Kagan in a minority dissent
to the Supreme Court’s decision this week that the monthly town board meetings
of Greece, N.Y. which opened with prayer - are constitutional.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the 5-4 majority, made a compelling case
that the upstate town of 94,000 is not coercing its citizens to engage in a
religious observance. The purpose of the prayer, led by local clergy, is to
“lend gravity to public proceedings and to acknowledge the place that religion
holds in the lives of many private citizens.”
Kennedy could find no “impermissible establishment of religion.” Its purpose was
to “place town board members in a solemn and deliberative frame of mind, invoke
divine guidance in town affairs and follow a tradition practiced by Congress and
dozens of state legislatures.”
A town employee called the churches listed in a local directory, all Christian.
From 1999 to 2007 no prayers were offered by non-Christians. And some spoke in
“a distinctly Christian idiom,” Kennedy said: Before Easter one prayed, “It is
in the solemn events of next week that we find the very heart and center of our
Christian faith. We acknowledge the saving sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the
cross.”
Residents Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens, one Jew and one atheist, said they
found the prayers “offensive, intolerable and an affront to a diverse community”
which was 2% Jewish. After their complaint, a Jewish layman, the chairman of a
Baha’I temple and a Wiccan priestess were invited to open the board meetings
with prayer. That never happened again.
The women brought suit alleging that the town violated the First Amendment’s
Establishment clause by preferring Christians over other prayer givers and by
sponsoring sectarian prayers “in Jesus’ name.” They said they were not seeking
an end to prayer, but requested an injunction for “inclusive and ecumenical
prayer.”
Kennedy wrote that “the First Congress provided for the appointment of chaplains
only days after approving language for the First Amendment” demonstrating that
“the Framers considered legislative prayer a benign acknowledgment of religion’s
role in society.”
He noted that “The principle audience for these invocations is not, indeed, the
public but lawmakers themselves, who may find that a moment of prayer or quiet
reflection sets the mind to a higher purpose and thereby eases the task of
governing.”
However in Greece, clergy faced the public and had their backs to town’s board.
Sometimes they asked citizens to “bow your heads with me as we invite the Lord’s
presence.”
Kennedy acknowledged some might find that offensive and “feel excluded and
disrespected. Offense, however, does not equate to coercion. Adults often
encounter speech they find disagreeable; and an Establishment Clause violation
is not made out any time a person experiences a sense of affront.”
He concluded that “prayer in this case has a permissible ceremonial purpose. It
is not an unconstitutional establishment of religion.”
Justice Kagan, who is Jewish, said she did not disagree with an earlier Supreme
Court case “upholding the Nebraska Legislature’s tradition of beginning each
session with a chaplain’s prayer.” However, she found the “Town of Greece’s
prayer practices violate” the Constitution’s “norm of religious equality”
because it “did nothing to recognize religious diversity...to involve,
accommodate, or in any way reach out to adherents of non-Christian religions.”
For a decade prayers were “steeped in only one faith.”
“That practice does not square with the First Amendment’s promise that every
citizen, irrespective of her religion, owns an equal share in her government.”
She said “Assume officials in a mostly Muslim town requested a muezzin to
commence such functions, over and over again, `God is greatest. God is greatest.
I bear witness that there is no deity but God. I bear witness that Muhammed is
the Messenger of God.’” That would go “beyond the constitutional pale.”
She quoted the Court in an earlier case, “`The clearest command of the
Establishment Clause,’ this Count has held, `is that one religious denomination
cannot be officially preferred over another.’”
Kagan posed another hypothetical case of a woman going to be naturalized where
she is asked “to stand and pray with others in a way conflicting with her own
religious beliefs. Perhaps she feels sufficient pressure to go along – to rise,
bow her head and join in whatever others are saying. After all, she wants, very
badly, what the judge…has to offer.”
Justice Samuel Alito commented that Kagan’s objection “is really quite
niggling.”
I don’t agree. I find her persuasive.
|
|
Since 1981...
2000+ Columns |
|
LATEST ARTICLE |
|
January
12, 2021: Column 2057: Trump Impeached a Second Time |
|
Recent Columns |
|
Trump is Corrupt |
|
Christian Choices Matter |
|
Who Was Mary? |
|
2020 Was A Terrible Year |
|
Suicides Rates Are Rising |
|
The Biblical Sexual Standard |
|
Thankful for Thanksgiving |
|
How to Cut the Divorce Rate in Half |
|
Divorce Rate Is Falling |
|
Latinos Deserve More Help |
|
How To Defeat Covid - 19 |
|
How To Save Marriages |
|
55 Years of Marriage |
|
How To Cut America's Divorce Rate |
|
Suicide Rate Rising |
|
Overcoming Porn Addiction |
|
The Devastation of Pornography |
|
Marriages Are Falling - But Improving |
|
Divorce Rates Are Falling |
|
Cohabitation: the Enemy of Marriage
|
|
How To Reduce Suicide |
|
How To Stop Drug Addiction |
|
Cut Federal Funds for Planned Parenthood |
|
The Horror of Soaring Suicides |
|
Make
Adoption More Appealing |
|
The Addictive Nature of Pornography |
|
Abortion Becoming Illegal |
|
Protecting Girls from Suicide |
|
The Worst Valentine:
Cohabitation |
|
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard |
|
Sextortion Kills Teens |
|
Cohabitation: A Risky Business |
|
Recent Searches |
|
gun control,
euthanasia,
cohabitation,
sexting,
sextortion,
alcoholism,
prayer,
guns,
same sex marriage,
abortion,
depression,
islam,
divorce,
polygamy,
religious liberty,
health care,
pornography,
teen sex,
abortion and infanticide,
Roe+v+Wade,
supreme court,
marriage,
movies,
violence,
celibacy,
living+together,
cohabitation,
ethics+and+religion,
pornography,
adultery,
divorce,
saving+marriages |
|