Ethics & Religion
September 22, 2016
Trump: Too Dishonest to be President
By Mike McManus
is too dishonest to be America's President. The Washington Post reported
this week: "Donald Trump spent more than a quarter million dollars from
his charitable foundation to settle lawsuits that involved the
billionaire's for-profit businesses."
These payments violate federal laws against "self-dealing" that
prohibits nonprofit leaders from using charity money to benefit
themselves or their businesses.
Two examples: Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida faced fines of $120,000
for erecting a giant flag on an 80-foot pole. Town rules said flagpoles
could only be 42 feet high. Trump told the press, "You don't need a
permit to put up the American flag." The town fined him $1,250 a day.
Trump sued in federal court, saying that a smaller flag "would fail to
appropriately express the magnitude of Donald J. Trump's...patriotism."
They settled, with the town agreeing to allow him to give $100,000 to
Fisher House, which runs comfort homes for military personnel and their
But the check was not issued by Trump personally or one of his
businesses, but from the Trump Foundation.
Second, a Trump golf course in Westchester, New York agreed to settle a
lawsuit by allowing him to make a $158,000 donation to the plaintiff's
chosen charity. The case stemmed from a hole-in-one shot by Martin
Greenburg, making him eligible for a $1 million prize. Later he was told
he won nothing because the shot had to go 150 yards!
Greenburg sued. Eventually, the golf course agreed for Trump to pay
$158,000 to a charity, which was the Martin Greenburg Foundation. Again,
the check came not from Trump personally or his golf course - but the
Another clear example of self-dealing as defined by the Federal Tax
Asked for his reaction, Jeffrey Tanenbaum told the Post, "I represent
700 non-profits a year, and I've never encountered anything so brazen.
If he's using other people's money, run through his foundation - to
satisfy his personal obligations, then that about as blatant an example
of self-dealing (as) I've seen."
Trump founded his charity in 1987 and for years was its only
contributor. But in 2006 the foundation gave away almost all of its
money, leaving only $4,238. Trump made small donations in 2007-8, but
nothing since. The money came from a few others such as pro-wrestling
executives Vince and Linda McMahon, who gave a total of $6 million.
Thus, Trump settled business law suits with other people's money!
The foundation even donated $25,000 to a political group supporting the
re-election of Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi. That gift was made at
the same time her office was considering whether to investigate fraud
allegations of so-called "Trump University." Needless to say, Florida
did not join other states suing the fraudulent university.
Trump bought her off, or rather, his foundation did so.
He even used Trump Foundation money to buy advertisements for his chain
of hotels and to purchase two portraits of himself! One costing $20,000
was for a 6-foot high portrait!
Richard Painter and Norman Eisen, attorneys who were chief White House
ethics lawyers for Presidents Bush and Clinton argued in a Washington
Post column Wednesday that a "Trump presidency would be ethically
compromised" for the following reasons:
"Opacity. Trump's refusal to disclose his tax returns shields critical
information about his finances." They ask, "How much tax is Trump paying
or sheltering domestically vs. in foreign jurisdictions? That needs to
be known to ascertain which nations Trump has financial ties to and
where he may be susceptible to pressure."
"Lack of divestment. Trump has said that if elected he would have the
managing his business and would not discuss business matters with them.
That is not sufficient. Presidents for the past half-century have either
converted assets to simple, conflict-free holdings such as U.S.
government bonds or blind trusts" used by Reagan, Carter, both Bushes
and Clinton. "Assumption of the presidency requires a much more
definitive break than Trump, so far, has been willing to make."
Foreign conflicts. More serious are possible conflicts his foreign
investments in Russia, China, India, etc. "When the United States must
support or confront those nations, would Trump act to benefit the
national interest or his family investments?"
Veracity. "We must address Trump's propensity for dishonesty. It is
disturbing that just 15% of his statements checked by PolitiFact are
`true' or `mostly true.' No ethics program can work if the client is not
To put it differently, Trump is 85% dishonest. That disqualifies him for
Copyright (c) 2016 Michel J. McManus,
President of Marriage Savers and a syndicated columnist. For previous
columns go to
Search for any topic.
30+ Years / 1700+ Columns
2017: Column 1860: Cohabitation: A Growing Problem - Part I
Texting While Driving - A Killer
Why Have "Religious Nones" Tripled?
Norma McCorvey Roe of Roe v. Wade
The Worst Valentine: Cohabitation
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard
Christianity Gives Women Equal Opportunity
Sextortion Kills Teens
Assisted Suicide Is Growing
same sex marriage,
abortion and infanticide,