Ethics & Religion
A Column by Michael J. McManus


For Current Column
See the Home Page


About the


Search this


Column Archives
List of all columns 









For 2003 and earlier
only the title is listed.
Use the Search Function
to find the article.








About The


to Mike

Ethics & Religion
Column #1,880
September 6, 2017
How To Reduce Drunk Driving Deaths
By Mike McManus

Nevada and Oklahoma became the 29th and 30th states to require ignition interlocks after a first drunk driving offense. Louisiana is one of those states that require the driver to blow into a device which measures their blood alcohol content. If the person is legally drunk, the car will not start.

From 2006-16, there were 2.3 million halted drunk drivers due to the interlock, according to Ron Replogle, law enforcement manager of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). In just 2016, 348,000 drunk drivers could not start their car!

The result is that the number of drunk driving deaths in America have fallen 51% from nearly 21,000 in 1982 to only 10,265 in 2015. MADD deserves credit for this plunge in alcohol related deaths, since it has been the major advocate for ignition interlocks to reduce drunk driving.

Florida debated a similar law this year, but did not pass it. Florida recorded 797 deaths due to drunk driving in 2015 - 103 more than the previous year, the biggest percentage jump of any state. Currently, Florida requires the ignition interlock only after a second drunk driving offense. The question is why didn't Florida vote to impose the interlock after a single offense? And why haven't 19 other states passed similar laws?

First-time offenders have driven drunk an average of 80 times before they are arrested!

What most other states do is suspend the drunk driver's license for a first offense. However, 50% to 75% of convicted drunk drivers continue to drive on a suspended license. Many states like Florida require the interlock only after a second offense.

(In some states, the definition of drunk driving is if a person's blood alcohol content (BAC) is .10, although most states have set the level at .08, as the official definition of drunk driving.)

Alcohol-impaired driving fatalities accounted for 29% of the total traffic deaths in 2015. Two-thirds of the 10,265 killed were due to drivers with a BAC of .15 or higher - double the usual drunk driving level.

One bright spot in this story is that the number of persons under age 21 killed in drunk driving crashes decreased 80% from the record high of 5,215 in 1982 to only 1,021 in 2015.

What's needed are laws that prevent first offenders from becoming repeat offenders, so that more lives are saved.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving was founded by Candy Lightner in 1980 after her daughter was killed by a repeat drunk driving offender. Few people have had such an impact in saving lives. MADD is now the largest nonprofit fighting to end drunk driving. It also works to reduced drugged driving and has supported more than million victims of these violent crimes.

MADD has helped save 340,000 lives as it has cut drunk driving in half!

How effective are ignition interlocks? New Mexico and Arizona were among the first states to pass laws requiring those convicted of one drunk driving offense to install an ignition interlock in 2006 and 2007. In the decade since their drunk driving deaths have fallen 30%.

These devices cost drivers an initial $75 to $100 for installation and then $2.15 a day or $785 over a year. That's not a small sum, but think of the saved lives.

Here are the 20 states that do not require the ignition interlock after a first offense: California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

It is time for the people of those states to demand that their state legislatures pass a law requiring an ignition interlock after a first offense.

A great step to save thousands of lives!.

Copyright (c) 2017 Michael J. McManus, President of Marriage Savers and a syndicated columnist. For previous columns go to Hit Search for any topic.

  Since 1981...
1900+ Columns
  October 16, 2019: Column 1992: Pastor Appreciation Month
  Recent Columns
  Should Pastors Marry Cohabitating Couples
  Faith & Values of Hispanic Americans
  How Doctors Might Reduce Suicides
  Rebirth of Falls Church Anglican
  Time for Gun Legislation
  Let's Raise the Minimum Wage
  Life Expectancy Falls - But You Can Live Longer
  Black America After 400 Years
  Let's Cut the Prison Population
  Red Flag Laws Not Enough
  The Horror of Soaring Suicides
  Let's Reform No Fault Divorce
  Make Adoption More Appealing
  Fates of Declaration Signers
  All Men Are Created Equal
  Want a Successful Marriage?
  Why Go To Marriage Encounter
  Scoutmasters Molest Boy Scouts
  Where Are the Fathers?
  The Addictive Nature of Pornography
  Abortion Becoming Illegal
  Pope's Initiative on Sexual Abuse
  Protecting Girls from Suicide
  Gun Control Laws Needed
  The Worst Valentine: Cohabitation
  Pornography: A Public Health Hazard
  Sextortion Kills Teens
  Cohabitation: A Risky Business
  Recent Searches
  gun control, euthanasia, cohabitation, sexting, sextortion, alcoholism, prayer, guns, same sex marriage, abortion, depression, islam, divorce, polygamy, religious liberty, health care, pornography, teen sex, abortion and infanticide, Roe+v+Wade, supreme court, marriage, movies, violence, celibacy, living+together, cohabitation, ethics+and+religion, pornography, adultery, divorce, saving+marriages
©2019 Michael J. McManus syndicated columnist  /
Ethics & Religion at
9311 Harrington Dr. / Potomac, MD 20854 / 301 978-7105
President & Co-Chair Marriage Savers /
Site Sponsored by