Ethics & Religion
A Column by Michael J. McManus


For Current Column
See the Home Page


About the


Search this


Column Archives
List of all columns 









For 2003 and earlier
only the title is listed.
Use the Search Function
to find the article.








About The


April 25, 2007
Column #1,339
Advance for April 28, 2007
A Case for More Gun Control
by Mike McManus

Katie Couric asked a legitimate question after the horrific mass murders at Virginia Tech: "Should government impose restrictions on what kind of guns are sold, and to whom? Would these restrictions make us any safer?"

The answer is a resounding yes. Consider the facts. 

In 2004 there were 73 firearm murders in all of England and Wales. Seung-Hui Cho killed almost half as many - 32 plus himself. That was more than half of the 49 gun murders in a year in Cho's native South Korea.

Japan prohibits handguns. Shotguns are strictly regulated, and rifles can be bought only after owning a shotgun for 10 years. Result: only 35 murders and 47 gun suicides in a nation of 127 million.

By contrast, in the U.S. 11,344 were shot and killed, plus 16,750 by suicide. That's 343 times Japan's rate! America's easy availability of guns has made death far more likely. Life expectancy is 82 in Japan vs. 78 here.

Pierre Lemieux, of the Independent Institute in Oakland, Cal. asked in The Washington Times, "What if some students or professors had been armed at Virginia Tech?" The no-brainer answer is there would be many more killings, especially after binge drinking on Saturday night.

Some say, "The crooks have no trouble buying guns. Why not let the good guys arm?"

This is not an issue of "bad" guys vs. "good" guys.  When I was 14, my drunk father and threatened my mother with a pistol.  I took it away and hid it from him, swearing I'd never have a weapon in my home when I grew up. I kept that pledge.

          In 1994 a U.S. ban on the sale of assault weapons went into effect. AK-47s, Uzis and  weapons that were designed to kill as many people as possible in a short time - could not be purchased here for a decade. Consequently, firearm deaths dropped from an average of 17,600 in 1990-1994 to 12,300 from 1995-2004. Then the law expired in 2004. Those weapons became available again, and bigger gun clips, like the 17 shell magazine in the Glock Cho purchased.  If he could only buy 5 in a magazine, perhaps he would have killed 10 instead of 32.

When he ran for re-election, George Bush said he supported renewing the federal assault weapon law and trigger locks.  However, he never introduced legislation to do so.

       We will always have crazies and felons who get their hands on guns. But the law does not require a background check for mental illness, which it should. According to the FBI, 1.3 million sales of weapons were denied to ex-convicts, thanks to the Brady law requiring background checks.  Cho had been treated in a mental health facility, and a court called him a danger to himself and others.  Virginia Gov. Timothy Kaine is considering an executive order to require giving information about the mental health of potential buyers to  gun sellers.

Also, given complaints to campus police by females that he was stalking them, and by two of his English professors who were alarmed by his violent writings - why did Virginia Tech  allow him to be a student?

There are 51,500 people living today who would have been murdered without the Brady law and the assault weapons ten-year ban.  No hunter was prevented from buying a gun.          

Suicides also dropped from an average of 18,700 before the assault weapon ban and the Brady bill vs. 17,250 afterwards. That's 14,500 fewer suicides over a decade.

     .  Virginia limits the number of weapons which can be bought to one a month.  No other state does so.  That reduced murders in Washington, because there aren't as many bad guys buying them in volume and re-selling them on the streets to kids who shoot to kill.

Why allow anyone purchase 30 at a time? Why not a national limit of one gun a month?

We have weak gun laws in America. But they saved 66,000 lives compared to the annual slaughter in past years.  That's more than the population of hundreds of American towns and cities.

Another loophole which must be closed is that no background checks are required if a gun is purchased at a gun show.  Why not?  Are they any less lethal?

It is high time for Bush to ignore the NRA and re-introduce an assault weapon ban, a national limit of one gun a month to anyone, an expansion of the Brady law to include gun show sales and a required check on mental backgrounds of buyers.

  Since 1981...
2000+ Columns
  Febrary 9, 2022: Column 2113: My Farewell Column: Happy Valentine's Week
  Recent Columns
  Writing Columns About Marriage
  Will Abortion Be Made Illegal?
  Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons
  Progress in Black-White Relations
  Marriage Is Disappearing
  Catholic Priest Celibacy Should Be Optional
  Blacks Must Consider Marriage
  The Need to End Catholic Priest Celibacy
  More Lessons For Life
  Lessons For Life
  Rebuilding Marriage in America
  How To Reduce Drunk Driving Deaths
  The Value of Couples Praying Together
  A Case for Pro-Life
  End The Death Penalty?
  Christian Choices Matter
  The Biblical Sexual Standard
  The Addictive Nature of Pornography
  Protecting Girls from Suicide
  The Worst Valentine: Cohabitation
  Pornography: A Public Health Hazard
  Sextortion Kills Teens
  Cohabitation: A Risky Business
  Recent Searches
  gun control, euthanasia, cohabitation, sexting, sextortion, alcoholism, prayer, guns, same sex marriage, abortion, depression, islam, divorce, polygamy, religious liberty, health care, pornography, teen sex, abortion and infanticide, Roe+v+Wade, supreme court, marriage, movies, violence, celibacy, living+together, cohabitation, ethics+and+religion, pornography, adultery, divorce, saving+marriages
2022 Michael J. McManus syndicated columnist
Ethics & Religion at
Site Sponsored by