July 22,
2009
Column #1,456
Why Is Government Destroying Families?
By Mike McManus
Frank Hatley was released from a Georgia jail after more than a year for failure
to pay child support even though a DNA test nine years ago proved that he was
not the father, reported columnist Phyllis Schlafly this week.
Judge Dane Perkins acknowledged in an August 21, 2001 court order, that Hatley
was not the father, but ordered him to pay child support anyway. Although he was
freed from making future payments in 2001, Judge Perkins forced Hatley to
continue making payments on the $16,000 that he owed.
Why? Because a 1986 federal law prohibits retroactive reduction of alleged
child support, even if a DNA test proved he was not the father. Also, when a
man is sent to jail for five years, his child support arrearages continue to
pile up while he is in prison, when he is incapable of paying.
This law, known as the Bradley Amendment (after then Sen. Bill Bradley), refuses
to allow a person who owes back child support to declare bankruptcy, like GM was
allowed to do, paying only a fraction of the debt it owed to bondholders.
The Bradley Amendment also forbids judicial consideration of a person's
clear inability to pay. In Frank Hatley's case, he paid $6,000 he did not owe
before being laid off from his job of unloading charcoal grills from shipping
containers. Although he ended up living in his car, he made another $3,500 of
payments from his Unemployment Insurance.
Neither Republican nor Democratic Administrations have proposed to repeal
the patently unjust Bradley Amendment. Why? The $28 billion collected from
largely non-resident fathers, reimbursed the government for $24 billion of its
cost of welfare payments to mothers.
They are a source of revenue from an avaricious government, who views
every father who falls behind as a ":dead-beat dad."
Child support payments are reasonable. If a man fathers a child, he has
an obligation to pay for it. And nine out of ten fathers are current in child
support if they have joint custody, as are eight of ten with visitation rights.
Relatively few are deadbeat dads.
However, if DNA proves the man is not the father, not only should all
child support payments cease, but any past debt should be waived, and past
unjust payments should be returned.
A judge should have the freedom to decide whether a man is too poor to
make back payments. Certainly, no one's child support arrearages should mount up
if he is in prison.
Furthermore, if the parent without child custody is making child support
payments, the parent deserves regular access to children. I know of one father
who has only seen his child five times in a year. He went to court to get
regular access, but lost.
The heavy hand of the law targets the presumed "deadbeat dad," but never
lands on the deadbeat mom who refuses dad's access to his children. As Frank
Hatley, 50, put it, "Out of it all, I just feel like justice should be served
for me in this case," he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution after his
release. "I shouldn't have to keep being punished for a child that is not mine."
Admittedly, Hatley's case is extreme in that his DNA proved him innocent.
However, it is not extreme that he was sent to jail for non-payment. Students
of American history think debtors prison was abolished in America before slavery
was abolished.
However, there are 30,000 to 50,000 fathers in jail for non-payment of
child support, according to Mike McCormick, president of the American Coalition
for Fathers and Children.
Dr. Michael Ross, an emergency room physician in Detroit who created the
Family Rights Coalition of Michigan to fight for fairer laws, charges "The
American dream has been aborted…Our laws and systems have been jerry-rigged to
destroy our family lives in the name of individual freedom.
"It is time to proclaim the vision of our founders and reestablish
mankind's biological institutions: marriage and parenting.
"Marriage is the answer for America and for the world."
He notes that only 44 percent of U.S. teenagers live with both married
parents. The marriage rate has plunged 50 percent since 1970. Divorce has
terminated 44 million marriages shattering the lives of 42 million children.
Nearly 40 percent of children are born out-of-wedlock.
Why? Often government programs subsidize cohabitation, not marriage. No
Fault Divorce laws reward the destruction of marriage, not its preservation. In
four out of five divorces, one spouse wants to preserve the marriage, but is not
given an equal voice in court to preserve it.
When will political leaders of either party fight unjust laws that are
destroying marriage, and enact laws to restore it?
|
|
Since 1981...
2000+ Columns |
|
CURRENT ARTICLE |
|
Febrary 9,
2022: Column 2113: My Farewell Column: Happy Valentine's Week |
|
Recent Columns |
|
Writing Columns About
Marriage |
|
Will Abortion Be Made Illegal? |
|
Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons |
|
Progress in Black-White Relations |
|
Marriage Is
Disappearing |
|
Catholic Priest Celibacy Should Be Optional |
|
Blacks Must Consider Marriage |
|
The Need to End Catholic Priest Celibacy |
|
More Lessons For Life |
|
Lessons For Life |
|
Rebuilding Marriage in America |
|
How To Reduce Drunk Driving Deaths |
|
The Value of Couples Praying Together |
|
A Case for Pro-Life
|
|
End
The Death Penalty? |
|
Christian Choices Matter |
|
The Biblical Sexual Standard |
|
The Addictive Nature of Pornography |
|
Protecting Girls from Suicide |
|
The Worst Valentine:
Cohabitation |
|
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard |
|
Sextortion Kills Teens |
|
Cohabitation: A Risky Business |
|
Recent Searches |
|
gun control,
euthanasia,
cohabitation,
sexting,
sextortion,
alcoholism,
prayer,
guns,
same sex marriage,
abortion,
depression,
islam,
divorce,
polygamy,
religious liberty,
health care,
pornography,
teen sex,
abortion and infanticide,
Roe+v+Wade,
supreme court,
marriage,
movies,
violence,
celibacy,
living+together,
cohabitation,
ethics+and+religion,
pornography,
adultery,
divorce,
saving+marriages |
|