Ethics & Religion
Column #1,982
August 15, 2019
Let's Cut the Prison Population
By Mike McManus
Too many Americans are in prison. In 2017 there were 1,489,000
prisoners, about 183,000 of whom were in federal prisons, with 1.3
million in state facilities. These numbers are down about 1% from 2016
and down by 100,000 prisoners since 2007.
However, state prison populations jumped 222% from 1980 to 2010. A major
reason is that one in seven prisoners is serving a life sentence. In
some states, one in three inmates has a life sentence. Many prisons have
become de facto nursing homes with a growing elderly population. The
average taxpayer cost per year is $30,000 per inmate.
What sense does this make? A criminal who has served 20 or 30 years is
usually not a danger to society. Crimes are committed by young men.
Arrests for violent crimes peak during late teens and early twenties.
In 2012 Maryland released nearly 200 prisoners who had served more than
30 years, mostly for homicides and rape. Fewer than 1 percent have
committed a crime in the half decade since their release.
The annual cost of mass incarceration is $81 billion. That figure could
be cut substantially if those serving life sentences were released years
before they died in prison.
Fortunately, there is a growing movement to reduce excessive sentences.
Legislation authorizing sentence reductions in old cases has passed in
California and the District of Columbia. Sen. Cary Booker has proposed
something similar at the federal level.
In fact, more than 3,000 old prisoners were released from federal
custody in July based on their good conduct, under the First Step Act
proposed by President Trump and agreed to by Congress in December.
James Foreman, Jr., a Yale Law School professor and Sarah Lustbader, a
senior legal counsel of the Justice Collaborative, co-authored an
article, "Rethinking Extreme Sentences," published by The New York Times
August 2, 2019. They proposed that prosecutors "can recognize their role
in creating the crisis and work toward fixing it. They should start by
opening "sentence review units" which would consist of small dedicated
teams of lawyers, investigators, data scientists and social workers
within the prosecutor's office.
"Each team would review past cases, and when they find sentences which
seem egregious, prosecutors would give these cases a second look."
That's a sensible proposal which ought to be considered by every
prosecutor's office. The concept of sentence review has been used to
root out cases in which an innocent person was sent to prison in error.
(See Professor Farmer's book, Locking Up Our Own: Crime and
Punishment in Black America.)
Foreman and Lustbader ask why prosecutors should lead the movement to
cut down long sentences? "Because they were and in many places still
are, a major driver of the sentencing explosion."
One prosecutor who is setting up a sentence review unit is Terry
Krasner, Philadelphia's District Attorney. He says, "Sometimes extreme
sentences reflect unscientific beliefs; sometimes they reflect racism;
and sometimes they reflect judges who punish you 10 times harder if you
went to trial."
Krasner adds that "There are a lot of people in jail who very clearly
don't need to stay in jail."
Blacks and Hispanics are more likely to be arrested and convicted than
whites. In 2017, there were 475,900 blacks in prison and 336,500
Hispanics compared to only 436,000 whites, who can hire better lawyers
to defend them. In the broader population, whites outnumber blacks 5-1 -
yet black prisoners outnumber whites. Racism is doubtless a factor.
The key question is how long should those found guilty of major crimes
be sentenced? I suggest that a maximum sentence might be 20 to 25 years
- and that anyone who has served that much time should be released,
unless they committed more crimes in prison.
Life sentences are rare in Britain, but common in the U.S. Last week an
English court handed a whole-life sentence to Dale Crogan for murdering
four people, including two policewomen. He will never be eligible for
release - one of only 50 British criminals serving such a sentence.
By contrast, at least 40,000 Americans are imprisoned without hope of
parole. Including 2,500 under the age of 18.
It is time for America to reconsider its extreme sentencing.
__________________________
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael J. McManus, a syndicated columnist and past president of Marriage Savers. To read past columns, go to
www.ethicsandreligion.com. Hit
Search for any topic.
|
|
Since 1981...
2000+ Columns |
|
CURRENT ARTICLE |
|
Febrary 9,
2022: Column 2113: My Farewell Column: Happy Valentine's Week |
|
Recent Columns |
|
Writing Columns About
Marriage |
|
Will Abortion Be Made Illegal? |
|
Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons |
|
Progress in Black-White Relations |
|
Marriage Is
Disappearing |
|
Catholic Priest Celibacy Should Be Optional |
|
Blacks Must Consider Marriage |
|
The Need to End Catholic Priest Celibacy |
|
More Lessons For Life |
|
Lessons For Life |
|
Rebuilding Marriage in America |
|
How To Reduce Drunk Driving Deaths |
|
The Value of Couples Praying Together |
|
A Case for Pro-Life
|
|
End
The Death Penalty? |
|
Christian Choices Matter |
|
The Biblical Sexual Standard |
|
The Addictive Nature of Pornography |
|
Protecting Girls from Suicide |
|
The Worst Valentine:
Cohabitation |
|
Pornography: A Public Health Hazard |
|
Sextortion Kills Teens |
|
Cohabitation: A Risky Business |
|
Recent Searches |
|
gun control,
euthanasia,
cohabitation,
sexting,
sextortion,
alcoholism,
prayer,
guns,
same sex marriage,
abortion,
depression,
islam,
divorce,
polygamy,
religious liberty,
health care,
pornography,
teen sex,
abortion and infanticide,
Roe+v+Wade,
supreme court,
marriage,
movies,
violence,
celibacy,
living+together,
cohabitation,
ethics+and+religion,
pornography,
adultery,
divorce,
saving+marriages |
|